From the video description:
"Based on new evidence and knowledge that functioning proteins are extremely rare, should Darwin’s theory of evolution be dismissed, dissected, developed or replaced with a theory of intelligent design? Has Darwinism really failed? Peter Robinson discusses it with David Berlinski, David Gelernter, and Stephen Meyer, who have raised doubts about Darwin’s theory in their two books and essay, respectively The Deniable Darwin, Darwin’s Doubt, and “Giving Up Darwin” (published in the Claremont Review of Books)."
As our collective knowledge of biology advances, it seems that new research increasingly points away from the secular beliefs of Neo-Darwinianism. Mathematics and probability theory has seemed to back macro-evolution up against a wall which is becoming seemingly inescapable for those trying to cling to the atheistic theory of macro-evolution. It's not some fringe theory to realize the challenges that modern biological discoveries present to Darwin, but the thoughts are grounded in sound scientific study. These three top scientists do a far better job at explaining some of the challenges that Darwinian theory presents for biologists than I can, so let's humble ourselves and listen to what they have to say:
Comments